From top to bottom in the system at the time, there was huge doubt about where to go and what to do.
Flagged As Main Period Video:
NO
Video Transcript:
<p>Looking around us in urban China at that time, it was still, very much, the same sort of picture you would have seen several years earlier. And officials in 1986 were, by and large, still locked in that ideological mindset of many years earlier. Their attitudes towards the foreign media were still certainly of that mold. And it was then not at all clear that the kind of economic changes that had occurred in the countryside would indeed take off in the cities. Everyone was still working in state-owned enterprises, people had no choice over their careers, they had no property, they lived in state assigned housing. Yes, the political rhetoric had shifted towards urban economic reform, but huge debates were raging in China, at the time, over whether or not they should be applied, how they should be applied and indeed what the outcome of such reform would be if it was carried out to the fullest extent. And whether there was a risk that urban reform would lead to utter chaos and the end of the Communist Party. From top to bottom in the system at the time, there was huge doubt about where to go and what to do. But, it was only one section of the Communist party, and that Maoist part that didn’t understand economics, that was deeply fearful of capitalism and felt that the party itself would be destroyed, remained very influential through the 1980s and into the early 1990s. So, it was a long process of disentanglement from the Maoist era. I think the truly revolutionary change, we didn’t begin to see until 1992.</p>
description:
James Miles talks about how even by 1986, there had been no real economic change in the cities and it was by no means clear that change would come.